| Hollow WPC Decking | Internal longitudinal chambers reduce the amount of material used. | Wood flour or wood fiber combined with thermoplastic polymer and additives. | Good resistance to normal outdoor moisture when the ends and installation details are properly protected. The internal chambers should not be allowed to retain standing water. | Low | Lighter than solid boards; adequate rigidity depends strongly on board profile, joist spacing, and support design. | Residential balconies, raised decks, rooftop terraces, and projects where handling weight is important. | Lower material consumption, easier handling, and reduced dead load on the supporting structure. | More sensitive to improper support spacing, impact at unsupported areas, and water entering open board ends. | Low to medium |
| Solid WPC Decking | Full or nearly full polymer-wood composite cross-section. | Wood fiber or flour, thermoplastic resin, pigments, stabilizers, and processing additives. | Very good resistance to decay and moisture compared with untreated natural wood, although prolonged water exposure can still affect fasteners and substructures. | Low | Heavier and generally more resistant to localized impact than hollow profiles. | High-traffic walkways, public terraces, stairs, seating areas, and applications requiring easier end cutting or routing. | Strong, stable, and less vulnerable to crushing at board ends or around fasteners. | Higher weight, greater material use, and potentially higher transport and installation effort. | Medium |
| Uncapped WPC Decking | Single-layer composite material is exposed across the top and sides. | Wood-polymer composite formulated as one homogeneous profile. | Good general moisture resistance, but the exposed wood content can absorb more water than a capped profile if the surface is damaged or poorly maintained. | Low to medium | Available in both hollow and solid constructions; rigidity depends on the selected profile. | Covered or moderately exposed residential decks where initial budget is a priority. | Usually more economical and easier to color-match after cutting because the core and surface are similar. | More susceptible to staining, color variation, surface weathering, and moisture-related dimensional changes than capped boards. | Low to medium |
| Capped or Co-Extruded WPC Decking | Composite core protected by a thin polymer-rich outer cap, often on the top and sides. | WPC core with an additional protective layer made mainly from thermoplastic polymer and color additives. | Very good surface protection against moisture, common stains, and everyday outdoor exposure. Cut ends may require end coating or sealing where specified. | Very low | Available in hollow or solid profiles; the cap improves surface protection but does not replace correct structural support. | Uncovered decks, pool surrounds, coastal properties, restaurants, hospitality areas, and high-use outdoor spaces. | Improved stain resistance, more consistent appearance, better color retention, and easier routine cleaning. | Higher purchase cost; damaged caps can be difficult to repair invisibly, and some surfaces can become hot in strong sunlight. | Medium to high |
| Mineral-Filled WPC Decking | Composite profile containing mineral fillers in addition to wood fiber and polymer. | Thermoplastic resin, wood content, mineral filler, pigments, and stabilizers. | Good resistance to moisture and decay; actual performance depends on the polymer matrix, formulation, and cap construction. | Low | Can provide increased dimensional stability and stiffness, but may be heavier and more difficult to cut than conventional WPC. | Large-format terraces, areas with substantial temperature changes, and projects prioritizing dimensional stability. | Lower thermal movement in some formulations, good rigidity, and improved resistance to profile deformation. | Heavier boards, more demanding machining, and performance differences between formulations require careful specification review. | Medium to high |
| Recycled-Content WPC Decking | Solid or hollow composite profile manufactured partly or largely from recovered polymer and wood materials. | Recycled thermoplastic, recycled wood fiber or flour, pigments, stabilizers, and other additives. | Can offer good moisture and rot resistance, but recycled feedstock quality and formulation consistency are important. | Low to medium | Weight and rigidity vary by profile and formulation rather than by recycled content alone. | Residential and commercial projects with environmental procurement targets or requirements for recycled material content. | Can reduce reliance on virgin raw materials and support project sustainability goals. | Color consistency, technical performance, and documented recycled content should be verified through product test data and certification. | Low to medium |
| PVC-Rich WPC Decking | Composite profile with a higher proportion of PVC polymer relative to wood content. | Polyvinyl chloride, wood flour or fiber, stabilizers, pigments, and processing modifiers. | Very good resistance to water, rot, and insects when correctly installed; performance remains dependent on joints, fasteners, and substructure drainage. | Low | Generally lighter than many polyethylene-based solid composites and can provide good dimensional stability. | Rain-exposed decks, balconies, wet climates, and projects requiring lower water absorption and stable profiles. | Low water absorption, good resistance to biological decay, and relatively stable dimensions. | May have a less wood-like feel, can be sensitive to high temperatures during installation, and requires compatible cutting and fastening methods. | Medium to high |