| 1 | Match the motor to the machine weight and gradeability. | Required tractive force, slope angle, machine mass, rolling resistance, and desired travel speed. | Select a motor with at least 15–20% more continuous tractive-force capacity than the calculated operating requirement. | Adequate reserve reduces overheating, pressure spikes, and premature bearing or gear wear. | Correct sizing generally lowers repair frequency and avoids the cost of replacing an undersized motor. |
| 2 | Compare efficiency across the full duty cycle. | Hydraulic-to-mechanical efficiency at working speed, low-speed torque, and peak-load frequency. | Typical travel-motor hydraulic-to-shaft efficiency is approximately 75–90% at rated operating conditions, depending on design and load. | Higher efficiency reduces heat generation and hydraulic power consumption, especially during long travel cycles. | A 5% efficiency improvement can significantly reduce fuel or electrical energy use in high-hour applications. |
| 3 | Choose the correct displacement and speed range. | Fixed or variable displacement, maximum speed, continuous torque, peak torque, and displacement ratio. | Variable-displacement motors are generally better for machines requiring both high breakout torque and efficient high-speed travel; fixed-displacement motors suit simpler, steady-duty systems. | Correct displacement prevents excessive motor speed, weak low-speed performance, and unnecessary hydraulic losses. | A simpler fixed-displacement unit often has a lower purchase price, while a variable unit may reduce energy cost over extended use. |
| 4 | Evaluate durability for shock loads and contamination. | Housing strength, bearing capacity, shaft load rating, case-pressure limit, sealing system, and contamination tolerance. | For construction and tracked equipment, prioritize high shock-load capacity, robust bearings, protected seals, and a documented cleanliness requirement such as ISO 4406 18/16/13 or cleaner. | Water, dust, metal particles, and excessive case pressure are common causes of early motor failure. | Better protection may increase initial cost but can reduce downtime and major component replacement expenses. |
| 5 | Check maintenance requirements and service access. | Oil filtration, case-drain inspection, leakage checks, port accessibility, seal replacement, and overhaul procedures. | Use clean hydraulic oil, monitor case-drain flow, and inspect connections and seals at routine service intervals; hydraulic oil replacement commonly falls within approximately 500–2,000 operating hours depending on the system and oil condition. | Good service access shortens inspection time and helps detect wear before a complete failure occurs. | Lower routine labor and easier seal or bearing service reduce the total maintenance burden. |
| 6 | Calculate total cost of ownership, not only purchase price. | Purchase price, installation, energy use, scheduled maintenance, downtime, overhaul, and expected service life. | Use a five-year cost model. As an illustrative index, set the lowest-cost option at 100 and compare alternatives using energy, maintenance, and downtime assumptions. | A motor with a higher initial price can be less expensive when it operates more efficiently and requires fewer repairs. | For high-utilization equipment, energy and downtime may represent a larger cost than the original motor purchase. |
| 7 | Verify system compatibility before final selection. | Rated pressure, peak pressure, flow rate, port size, mounting dimensions, shaft interface, brake compatibility, and control requirements. | Confirm that continuous and peak pressure ratings exceed the machine's measured operating conditions, with at least 10–15% practical margin where appropriate. | Mechanical or hydraulic incompatibility can cause leakage, poor braking, excessive heat, or immediate installation problems. | Correct compatibility avoids adapter costs, installation delays, rework, and damage caused by incorrect pressure or flow. |